NUCLEAR
ChestDemonstration dataV/Q Lung Scan (Ventilation-Perfusion)
The ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan compares regional pulmonary blood flow with regional ventilation to detect pulmonary embolism. Tc-99m MAA particles lodge transiently in pulmonary arterioles to map perfusion, while an inhaled radioaerosol or radioactive gas maps ventilation. A perfusion defect with normal ventilation (mismatch) in a segmental distribution is the hallmark of PE. It is the preferred test when CT pulmonary angiography is contraindicated, particularly in pregnancy and iodinated-contrast allergy, and delivers a lower breast/fetal dose.
Indications
- Suspected acute pulmonary embolism when CTPA is contraindicated or undesirable
- Pregnant or young patients where reduced breast and fetal radiation dose is advantageous
- Iodinated contrast allergy or significant renal impairment
- Diagnosis and mapping of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)
- Pre-operative quantification of regional lung function before lung resection or volume reduction
Contraindications & Cautions
- Right-to-left cardiac shunt or severe pulmonary hypertension are relative contraindications for MAA (systemic embolisation of particles) β reduce particle number
- Pregnancy is not a contraindication; a perfusion-only (half-dose MAA) protocol is often used first to limit fetal dose
- Breastfeeding: interrupt or discard milk for ~12 h after Tc-99m aerosol/MAA per local guidance owing to free pertechnetate/aerosol
- Known severe allergy to human albumin products (MAA)
- Reduce MAA particle number in children, pregnancy and pulmonary hypertension to minimise capillary occlusion
Patient Preparation
- Obtain a current chest radiograph (ideally within ~24 h) for correlation and interpretation
- No fasting required; explain the breathing manoeuvre for the ventilation component
- Confirm pregnancy status; counsel on the perfusion-only reduced-dose option where appropriate
- Inject MAA with the patient supine to distribute particles evenly and reduce gravitational gradient
- Ensure the patient can perform a tidal-breathing inhalation of the ventilation agent
Technique & Parameters
- Perfusion: Tc-99m MAA ~40-150 MBq (~200,000-500,000 particles; fewer in pregnancy/pulmonary hypertension) injected slowly IV with the patient supine
- Ventilation: Tc-99m Technegas or DTPA aerosol, or Xe-133 / Kr-81m gas, inhaled during tidal breathing
- Acquire planar images in 6-8 projections (anterior, posterior, both laterals, and obliques) for both phases
- When ventilation follows perfusion, use a higher ventilation dose to overcome existing Tc-99m activity (or vice versa)
- SPECT or SPECT/CT improves segmental localisation and reduces indeterminate studies
Systematic Review
- Correlate with the chest radiograph to identify matching parenchymal abnormalities
- Assess perfusion images segment by segment for defects and their shape (wedge/segmental versus non-segmental)
- Compare each perfusion defect with the corresponding ventilation image to classify as matched or mismatched
- Count the number and size (large/moderate/small) of mismatched segmental defects
- Apply modified PIOPED/PISAPED probability criteria to assign a diagnostic category
Key Findings & Significance
- Segmental or larger perfusion defect with normal ventilation (V/Q mismatch) is the hallmark of acute PE
- High probability: two or more large mismatched segmental perfusion defects without matching radiographic abnormality
- Matched V/Q defect with corresponding radiographic opacity suggests parenchymal disease (e.g. pneumonia, COPD), not PE
- Normal perfusion effectively excludes clinically significant PE
- Multiple bilateral mismatched defects with mosaic perfusion in a stable patient suggest chronic thromboembolic disease (CTEPH)
Differential Considerations
- V/Q mismatch: acute PE, chronic thromboembolic disease, extrinsic vascular compression, prior embolism/scarring
- Matched defect: pneumonia, COPD/emphysema, atelectasis, effusion, bullae
- Reverse mismatch (ventilation defect > perfusion defect): mucus plugging, consolidation, atelectasis
- Non-segmental perfusion defect: cardiomegaly, mediastinal mass, pleural effusion
- Diffuse heterogeneous perfusion: pulmonary hypertension, small-vessel disease
Pearls & Pitfalls
- A perfusion-only study is often diagnostic in young patients with a normal chest radiograph and halves the dose
- Interpret against a current chest radiograph β matched radiographic opacity reclassifies a defect away from high probability
- The "stripe sign" (peripheral rim of preserved perfusion around a defect) argues against embolic occlusion
- Inject MAA supine and avoid drawing blood back into the syringe to prevent hot-spot clumping artefacts
- SPECT/CT reduces the intermediate/indeterminate category compared with planar imaging
Structured Report
- State tracers, activities, projections and whether SPECT/CT was performed
- Report the number, size and distribution of matched and mismatched defects with radiographic correlation
- Assign a probability category (normal, very low, low, intermediate/indeterminate, high) using modified PIOPED
- For CTEPH, describe the bilateral segmental mismatch pattern
- Give a clear conclusion on the likelihood of PE and any recommended further imaging
References
- Bajc M, et al. EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019
- PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA 1990
- SNMMI Procedure Standard for Lung Scintigraphy 4.0
- Parker JA, et al. SNM practice guideline for lung scintigraphy. J Nucl Med Technol 2012
Educational clinical decision support only. Protocols vary by institution and equipment; always confirm with a qualified radiologist and local guidelines before clinical use.